Message 51–60 sur 61
Précédent « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Suivant
par
Kamikaze Justice10 jours plus tôt
If the claim by the deleted account is in the middle of a Wonder, just give it to the Wonder Builder... no charge (or Firefly can delete the 2,000 coins). That way, there's no chance of a griefer sneaking in there to buy the claim before the Wonder builder does. There are a few claims on my Wonder, done by griefers, that should be transferred to me.
par
Firefly8 jours plus tôt
Somehow I missed the answers to my latest question; thanks for all your replies! I agree with the sentiment of a deleted account being abandoned, but I don't want to auto- or blanket-unclaim these. Even deleted players left a mark in the world and I can see some of their claims having actual, nice construction done in them. I want to respect their claim-permanence. In the actual case we have one, mostly-empty claim by a deleted account in the middle of an area where a player is actively building. I think it is fair to unclaim this one, so I'll postulate a new rule so that it's clear for everybody. Here's the new rule, preceded by the original rule (see post #2 in this topic): I.) Subject to my judgement I will reserve the right to unclaim lands in or near an existing or future wonders to allow the original builder to expand and/or improve their work. II.) Subject to my judgement I will reserve the right to unclaim undeveloped lands claimed by a deleted account to allow builders to expand and/or improve their work. Essential elements for rule II are that the original claim must be undeveloped ("largely empty"), that the claim is assigned to a deleted account, and that the person requesting the unclaim must show they are building something with at least some aesthetic quality (a "work") near the claim. Everyone fully on board with this new rule? @Kamikaze Justice: Sounds like you have a few claims that are covered by rule I. PM me the coordinates of the claims and I'll go take a look and potentially take action.
par
Kamikaze Justice4 jours plus tôt
I like the idea of claimed land with creatures that can still spawn. Maybe, there can be an on/off switch for those of us that still want creatures to spawn on our land. And Hummm can claim hunting land that can still spawn creatures, and no one would be able to buy it from under his nose.
par
Firefly4 jours plus tôt
@Kamikaze Justice: I'm convinced the idea of toggling creatures on/off was floated somewhere in the past and it didn't seem viable at that time, but the recent additions to the Land page can make it work. It'd be a new checkbox next to 'visible' and 'favorite' per land. One newbie trap I see is that a wonder builder can then set their spawn claim to have creatures and nobody will be prepared so they die :-) Fun for the whole family, but maybe I'll have to force wonders to always be non-spawn. And the default would be non-spawn so that non-website users don't run into nasty surprises.
par
Loki The Witful4 jours plus tôt
Bro someone’s ears were on fire. I was just talking about the idea what if we could toggle creatures spawn on claimed land, and was about to be write a forum topic with the idea!!! Edit: Maybe creatures should be allowed to be toggled on in wonders, but not be aggressive by default so that if the wonder builder wanted they could have natural creature wildlife. Just a thought. Edit again: Also we should make the claim have a visual display that will warn players that it will spawn wild creatures, like change the chunk highlight to orange. Plus add a warning symbol to claim player name: ⚠️:creatures:⚠️player_name ⚠️:creatures:⚠️
par
iBookChick4 jours plus tôt
This is crazy, @Loki the Witful and I were just talking about this very idea!
Message 51–60 sur 61
Précédent « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 » Suivant
Hummm