Angeldust

YouTube Twitch Facebook Instagram Discord Twitter
Steam (Windows, macOS, Linux) Windows iTunes App Store

FYI: Wonders

ใน English ใน ฟอรัม





โพสต์ 41–50 ของ 52

ก่อนหน้านี้ « 1 2 3 4 5 6 » ต่อไป


# 41

โดย

GODkinjal

1 ปี ที่ผ่านมา


I didn't noticed huh


# 42

โดย

Firefly

1 ปี ที่ผ่านมา


I've invoked rule I to unclaim one land next to a potential wonder being built by @ritpop. The land appeared to be abandoned and was preventing construction and expansion. I've sent a private message to the player involved, and refunded them 1,000 coins.


# 43

โดย

corpsehusband

1 ปี ที่ผ่านมา


ff can I send the cords of my Rabotik build to you on your PM?


# 44

โดย

Firefly

8 เดือน ที่ผ่านมา


I've invoked rule I to unclaim two lands next to a potential wonder being built by @song123. The land appeared to be abandoned and was preventing construction and expansion. I've sent a private message to the player involved, and refunded them 2,000 coins.


# 45

โดย

Hummm

8 เดือน ที่ผ่านมา


Poll: I submit public disclosure is neither warranted nor needed. Only parties involved should even be considered for notification. Especially if we ever hope to have an /unclaim command. How many agree with me?


# 46

โดย

Elki

8 เดือน ที่ผ่านมา


Hummm I couldn't agree more, especially regarding the /unclaim command.


# 47

โดย

Firefly

7 ชั่วโมง ที่ผ่านมา


Interesting twist: a player asked me to unclaim a land that is owned by a deleted account. This specific land doesn't appear to be developed much, there are no visible buildings or modifications to the terrain. It's (now*) in the center of a larger build by the requesting player—no comment on it being wonder-worthy. What to do? The potential for abuse I see is that a player can "circum-claim" an existing claim by a deleted account and ask me to then remove it. The asterisk* above denotes that I don't want to investigate the entire chronology of a build before making a decision like this. Feedback appreciated to guide the future of my moderation.


# 48

โดย

obi-

6 ชั่วโมง ที่ผ่านมา


publicly expose the player asking for the unclaim, and show screenshots of their build on stream, and let us judge if they are unclaim worthy (i think just unclaim, clearly the deleted player doesnt care anymore)


# 49

โดย

Loki The Witful

4 ชั่วโมง ที่ผ่านมา


Honestly I just unclaim it. If the player deleted their account then 99% they do not care what happens to the land. More over. I think if a player deletes their account then the land probably should be unclaimed naturally by the sever, with a given month of wait time, just to be extra cautious. Just my thoughts.


# 50

โดย

Hummm

4 ชั่วโมง ที่ผ่านมา


I agree with Obi and Loki; account delete is insta unclaim, no wait required. There's a big difference from walking away, and requesting account delete. Further, players STILL playing should be able to unclaim themselves, (many have been asking for this for MANY years, basically ever since FF implemented claims)


โพสต์ 41–50 ของ 52

ก่อนหน้านี้ « 1 2 3 4 5 6 » ต่อไป